Non-Tariff Barriers :: Complaints

Resolved complaints

Showing items 201 to 220 of 930

Complaint number	NTB Type Category 1. Government participation in trade & restrictive practices tolerated by governments 1.1. Export subsidies 1.2. Government monopoly in export/import 1.3. State subsidies, procurement, trading, state ownership 1.4. Preference given to domestic bidders/suppliers 1.5. Requirement for counter trade 1.6. Domestic assistance programmes for companies 1.7. Discriminatory or flawed government procurement policies 1.8. Import bans 1.9. Determination of eligibility of an exporting country by the importing country 1.10. Determination of eligibility of an exporting establishment (firm, company) by the importing country 1.11. Occupational safety and health regulation 1.12. Multiplicity and Controls of Foreign exchange market 1.13. "Buy national" policy 1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions 1.15. Other Category 2. Customs and administrative entry procedures 2.1. Government imposing antidumping duties 2.2. Arbitrary customs classification 2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin 2.4. Import licensing 2.5. Decreed customs surcharges 2.6. Additional taxes and other charges 2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures 2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures 2.9. Issues related to transit fees 2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges 2.11. Lack of control in Customs infrastructure 2.12. Lack of capacity of Customs officers 2.13. Issues related to Pre-Shipment Inspections 2.14. Other Category 3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT) Category 4. Sanitary & phyto-sanitary (SPS) measures Category 5. Specific limitations 5.1. Quantitative restrictions 5.2. Exchange controls 5.3. Export taxes 5.4. Quotas 5.5. Import licensing requirements 5.6. Proportion restrictions of foreign to domestic goods (local content requirement) 5.7. Minimum import price limits 5.8. Embargoes 5.9. Non-automatic licensing 5.10. Prohibitions 5.11. Quantitative safeguard measures 5.12. Export restraint arrangements 5.13. Other quantity control measures 5.14. Restrictive licenses 5.15. Other Category 6. Charges on imports 6.1. Prior import deposits and subsidies 6.2. Administrative fees 6.3. Special supplementary duties 6.4. Import credit discriminations 6.5. Variable levies 6.6. Border taxes 6.7. Other Category 7. Other procedural problems 7.1. Arbitrariness 7.2. Discrimination 7.3. Corruption 7.4. Costly procedures 7.5. Lengthy procedures 7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof) 7.7. Complex variety of documentation required 7.8. Consular and Immigration Issues 7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure 7.10. Other Category 8. Transport, Clearing and Forwarding 8.1. Government Policy and regulations 8.2. Administrative (Border Operating Hours, delays at border posts, etc.) 8.3. Immigration requirements (Visa, travel permit) 8.4. Transport related corruption 8.5. Infrastructure (Air, Port, Rail, Road, Border Posts,) 8.6. Vehicle standards 8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees 8.8. Issues related to transit Other Policy or Regulatory NTB Not a policy or regulatory NTB	Date of incident	Location COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Reporting country or region (additional) COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Status	Actions
NTB-000-220	2.2. Arbitrary customs classification	2009-07-28	Zambia: Zambia Revenue Authority	Zambia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	The valuation of imported goods carried by Small cross border traders is not transparent. Customs officials rely on power to impound imported goods to make small scale cross border traders pay rather suspicious duties.
Resolution status note:	Zambia reported that she is using the WTO Customs Valuation procedure, and has an appeals mechanism to address complaints from the traders
NTB-000-219	2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin	2009-07-28	South Africa: South Africa Revenue Services	Zambia	Resolved 2010-07-22	View
Complaint:	SARS is issuing a blue colour SADC certificate of origin with wrong specifications instead of the approved Yellow certificate which is in accordance to the SADC specifications. Zambia Revenue Authority has rejected the blue certificates and demanded that Zambian importers pay full duties as deposits in order to clear their cargo which would have qualified under the SADC rules of origin had a proper certificate been issued.
Resolution status note:	South Afric areported that SARS corrected the anomally and are noiw issuing correct colour certificate of origin
NTB-000-221	1.1. Export subsidies B31: Labelling requirements	2009-07-28	South Africa: SANAS	Zambia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Restrictions of exports on account of standards and provision of user instructions in specified local languages.Restriction of coffee exports and exports of paste detergents to South Africa and Zimbabwe
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that SADC is in the process of implementing the TBT annex and establishing the necessary regional institutions to create a regional accreditation system. Until the structures are developed and operational, South Africa will continue to request that products which are not accredited by recognized international accreditation bodies be retested by the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS). This exercise is not meant to deny SA trading counterpart’s access to the South African market, but simply to protect South African consumers.
NTB-000-222	5.12. Export restraint arrangements	2009-07-28	Zambia: Ministry of Trade	Zimbabwe	Resolved 2011-03-04	View
Complaint:	Restriction of coffee exports and exports of paste detergents to Zimbabwe
Resolution status note:	Zimbabwe reported that there are no more restrictions on these exports.
NTB-000-224	5.4. Quotas Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-28	SADC	Zambia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Import Quotas into SACU member states for sugar
Resolution status note:	Botswana reported that this is a SACU wide policy decision.
NTB-000-223	5.1. Quantitative restrictions	2009-07-28	Zambia: Ministry of Trade	Zambia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Restricted importation of fruits and vegetables
Resolution status note:	Zambia reported that she does not restrict the importation of fruits and vegetables as long as they fulfill the necessary import requirements.
NTB-000-228	5.3. Export taxes	2009-07-28	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	Botswana	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	In South Africa, Minister can impose export tax under the Livestock and meat industries Act
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that this act is in Botswana not SA. SA has an ‘Animal Health Act and the Meat Safety Act’, there are no export taxes under this act.
NTB-000-225	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-28	Zambia: Zambia Revenue Authority	Zambia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	An Escort fee of either K900 000.00 or K800 000.00 depending on the route is charged. The escort charge covers the expenses for the customs officials who accompany the commercial transit traffic from port of entry to port of exit.
Resolution status note:	Zambia reported that, under normal circumstances, Customs officers do not accompany commercial transit traffic. If motor vehicles such as trucks need to be escorted they use private escorts who charge them accordingly. These are purely private commercial arrangements between transporters and private escorters. However, if such goods in transit are deemed risky by Customs Officers, then Customs Officers would escort such trucks/vehicles. In such cases, the Zambian law requires that an escort fee be paid to Customs Officers by the transporter, and the fee is dependent on the distance to be covered
NTB-000-238	7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof)	2009-08-13	SADC	Mozambique	Resolved 2011-02-06	View
Complaint:	Mozambique is experiencing difficulties using the NTBs online reporting system because it does not have a portuguese version. It is not enough to translate the user guide because users need to intract with the system itself. The secretariat should urgently look into this issue to enable Portuguese speaking countries to utilise the system.
Resolution status note:	Website has been translated into French and Portuguese languages
NTB-000-258	6.2. Administrative fees Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-08	Namibia: Namibia Agronomic Board	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	The Namibian Agronomic Board decided not to register agents for white maize imports anymore. The permit fee is now NAD51.00/permit and the permit is valid for a specific period (one month) only
Resolution status note:	Namibia reported that there is no need for agents for white maize imports. The permit fee of N$ 51.00 covers administrative costs only. Period of validation is one month because all imports are effected in one month. The import of maize and maize products from all 3rd parties is only regulated for the time the local harvest is not taken up by the local milling sector.
NTB-000-266	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures	2009-09-08	Namibia: Ministry of Trade	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	The following stringent conditions stringent and cumbersome conditions are applied on the re-export (in bond mainly to Angola) of controlled petroleum products subject to permit: a) A trade permit obtained from MTI a copy of which is to be supplied to the ministry. B) The oil company involved and prices qouted shall be reviewed in writing in MTI. c) Prices shall include all basic purchase costs
Resolution status note:	Namibia reported that this information is required for the Government to determine the amount of tax to be paid by the exporting company and for Custom and excise levies
NTB-000-260	2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges	2009-09-08	South Africa: SARS	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Namibia's ASYCUDA system allows for direct inputs by both local and foreign traders and communicates well with customs clearance system used in the region (mostly ASYCUDA). South Africa has, years after Botswana and Namibia introduced it, introduced the SAD500(Single Administrative Document) for customs clearance system yet does not allow for direct input by traders/ freight forwarders not registered in South Africa into its system ( not ASYCUDA).
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that Single Administrative Document (SAD) has been introduced to make the clearance of goods easier and more convenient for importers, exporters and cross-border traders on 01 October 2006. The SAD complies with international best practices and Customs standards; with similar documents having been introduced throughout the world
NTB-000-264	5.12. Export restraint arrangements Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-08	Namibia: Ministry of Trade	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	An export licence is required for all non-SACU SADC exports,even if product does not feature on the positive list. No general export licencing applies to SACU trade.
Resolution status note:	Namibia reported that an export permit but not a license is required for controlled products only
NTB-000-290	8.8. Issues related to transit	2009-09-08	Namibia: Namibia Revenue Authority	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Namibia requires provisional payments for all transit cargo through Namibia.
Resolution status note:	Namibia reported that the provisional payment is required to secure duties and taxes of the goods in transit that can be refunded upon submission of export documents by the exporter.
NTB-000-277	5.3. Export taxes	2009-09-08	Rwanda: Ministry of Trade	Rwanda	Resolved 2011-10-27	View
Complaint:	Export levies of 15% is charged on unprocessed goat hides
Resolution status note:	Rwanda hs lifted the ban on exportation of raw hides and skins. However, the 5th EAC regional forum on NTBs held from 1-3 Septmber 2011 noted that the ban was appllied by all EAC countries with the aim to encourage value addition on raw hides towards export.
NTB-000-265	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures	2009-09-08	Namibia: Ministry of Trade	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	General export licences and permits issued for all non SACU exports are processed by hand. There is no interface between the MTI permit system and ASYCUDA. The system is unpredictable with ever changing procedures as per the SACU agreement's Jacobsens' Index. The IEM requirements are not widely known, especially among incidental traders. There is limited capacity at MTI to handle and process the import and export permits. At present only one official is handling the permits. HS codes need to be obtained from Customs and Excise since MTI is not equiped to assist in this.
Resolution status note:	Namibia reported that the system determines the change in the rate of duties but not procedures due to economic and policy considerations. Information leaflets on IEM are readily available at the Customs information centre and more will be available at MTI.
NTB-000-251	7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof)	2009-09-08	Namibia: Namibia Revenue Authority	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Customs documentation not stamped on export of pharmaceuticals to RSA, Angola and Botswana,is left behind and delivered late resulting in late claim or no claim of VAT.
Resolution status note:	Namibia reported that, procedurally no parcels are allowed to leave the Border with out the accompanying documentation. The same procedures are expected to apply at the border of the receiving country otherwise the items cannot be cleared
NTB-000-294	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-08	Namibia: Walvsi Bay sea port	Namibia	Resolved 2010-12-01	View
Complaint:	Delays occur at Walvis Bay to get the required documentation out in time for the trucks to leave. It leads to the company paying demurrage/penalties for trucks standing idle
Resolution status note:	Recruitment of personnel in process
NTB-000-242	2.4. Import licensing Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-08	Namibia: Ministry of Agriculture	Namibia	Resolved 2011-07-28	View
Complaint:	All imports of white maize, yellow maize i.e. the controlled agronomic crops, are subjected to an import permit from the Namibian Agronomic Board (NAB). The import of white maize meal. During harvesting season which runs from the 1st of May till the end of August/September (depends on the size of the local harvest) the imports of all white maize is prohibited, though subject to availability of local supply
Resolution status note:	At the 9th meeting of the SADC Sub-committee on trade facilitation, Namibia reported that the import of Maize and maize products from all third parties is only regulated for the time the local harvest is not taken up by the local milling sector.
NTB-000-245	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-08	Angola: Ministry of Trade	Namibia	Resolved 2011-11-30	View
Complaint:	The acquisition of Pre-shipment inspection numbers and consequent inspection of shipments for exports to Angola make transport pre-planning quite difficult and cause lengthy delays for the transport industry.
Resolution status note:	During the NTBs national workshop held in Angola on 30 November 2011, Angola reported that this NTB lacks clarity and complainant could not be traced to provide additional information. The complaint is therefore considered resolved unless additional information is provided.

<< Previous 1 2 3...9 10 11 12 13...45 46 47 Next >>

Display:

Non-Tariff Barriers

Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism

Resolved complaints